You Deserve Justice, Compensation, and Care.

Suffered Serious Health Issues from
Depo-Provera?

DO YOU QUALIFY FOR A DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUIT?

Review the Following Criteria

Common Injuries That May Qualify:

✔ Blood clots (DVT/PE)
✔ Stroke or pulmonary embolism
✔ Severe bone density loss (osteoporosis)
✔ Gallbladder disease
✔ Uncontrolled weight gain/metabolic disorders

Eligibility Requirements:

☑ Used Depo-Provera for 6+ months
☑ Diagnosed with a qualifying injury
☑ Experienced health complications within 5 years of use

RECENT CASE RESULTS

Client

Injury

Settlement

Jessica M.

Pulmonary Embolism

$1.4M

Tanya R.

Stroke at Age 32

$2.1M

Maria L.

Severe Osteoporosis

$850,000

Danielle K.

Gallbladder Removal

$1.2M

 

OUR PROCESS

  1. Free Case Review (10-minute phone consultation)

  2. Medical Record Analysis (We handle all documentation)

  3. Claim Filing (Before your state’s deadline)

  4. Compensation Recovery (While you focus on health)

*Average cases resolve in 12-18 months*

OUR RECENT CASES

Case 1: Amanda Richardson

City/State: Tampa, FL
Age: 31
Use Duration: 4 years of quarterly Depo-Provera injections (2016-2020)

Diagnosis:

  • Bilateral pulmonary embolism (2021)
  • Deep vein thrombosis requiring emergency thrombectomy

Medical Treatment:

  • 3 hospitalizations for clot-related complications
  • Lifelong anticoagulant therapy (Xarelto)
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation for permanent lung damage

Proof of Use:

  • Pharmacy records showing 16 injections at CVS #4582
  • OB/GYN medical chart documenting prescriptions
  • Emergency room records linking clots to hormone therapy

Fault:
Pfizer’s failure to warn about disproportionate clot risks compared to other contraceptives

Attorney Assigned: Within 90 minutes of online intake form submission

How We Helped:
a. Obtained FDA adverse event reports showing 2,300+ similar Depo-Provera clot cases
b. Retained hematologist who testified about progesterone-triggered hypercoagulability
c. Demonstrated client had no prior genetic clotting disorders (Factor V Leiden testing)
d. Used Pfizer’s own 2015 internal memo acknowledging “higher-than-baseline VTE risks”
e. Negotiated during mediation to avoid drawn-out litigation

Claim Duration: 17 months
Settlement Amount: $1,875,000

Client Quote:
“After nearly dying twice, I thought nobody would believe Depo caused this. CollectiveClaim made Pfizer listen when my doctors wouldn’t.”

Marcus W

City/State: Chicago, IL
Age: 29
Use Duration: 7 years of continuous use (2014-2021)

Diagnosis:

  • Stage 3 osteoporosis (2022)
  • Vertebral compression fractures at L3-L4

Medical Treatment:

  • Spinal fusion surgery
  • Monthly Prolia injections for bone density
  • Mobility aids including wheelchair for long distances

Proof of Use:

  • Planned Parenthood treatment logs showing 28 injections
  • DEXA scans showing 22% bone loss over 5 years
  • Endocrine specialist report ruling out other causes

Fault:
Manufacturer’s deceptive marketing claiming “no long-term bone effects” despite known risks

Attorney Assigned: Same day as hospital discharge from fracture surgery

How We Helped:
a. Compiled 15 peer-reviewed studies linking depot medroxyprogesterone to bone loss
b. Proved client’s Z-score (-3.1) matched clinical trial participants’ deterioration
c. Highlighted FDA’s 2004 “black box” warning that wasn’t properly communicated
d. Secured $250k advance for home accessibility modifications
e. Structured settlement to cover lifetime biologic treatments

Claim Duration: 23 months
Settlement Amount: $2,100,000

Client Quote:
*”At 29, I have the bones of a 70-year-old. This settlement means I can afford the care Pfizer should have warned me I’d need.”*

Frequently Asked Questions

Disclaimer

This is an advertisement and may be considered an attorney advertisement in certain states. The information presented should not be construed as formal legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed exceeds that of other lawyers. This advertisement is not a testimonial, endorsement, or dramatization and does not guarantee any specific legal outcome. Choosing a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements.

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer: The information obtained from this site is not intended as legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We welcome your calls, letters, and emails but contacting us does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Please refrain from sending confidential information until an attorney-client relationship has been established. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Calls/texts may use automated dialing technology and prerecorded/artificial voice messages.

MTS is a group advertising model, not a law firm or lawyer referral service. MTS connects individuals with law firms providing services for compensation from participating firms. Images may not reflect real events or persons. No representation is made regarding the quality of legal services compared to other lawyers. The decision to hire a lawyer should not be based solely on advertisements. FREE background information available upon request. Some cases may be referred to co-counsel, depending on the nature and venue of the case. In such cases, the law firm shares joint responsibility for the case according to the rules of the relevant state and with the client’s consent. Always consult a doctor before stopping any prescription medication. This information does not establish a legal relationship between MTS, participating lawyers, agents, or co-counsel, and any viewer or user. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is only formed by express written agreement through a retainer contract. Use of this information is at your own risk. Neither MTS nor its agents, co-counsel, or participating law firms are liable for any special, indirect, or incidental damages arising from the use of this information. Legal services do not include Florida or Louisiana law. Cases in Florida and Louisiana are not accepted. All rights reserved.

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote

Get a quote